Students Against Rigged NISG Elections! was created to express outrage against NISGelections.com, which functions as an “independent” media outlet covering the NISG election cycle. This website is written and monitored by a single individual, Trevor Boeckmann, a current member of NISG, and he has recently explicitly claimed that he engages in editorializing and that the website functions as an advocacy medium.
I've heard that if you "put" quotes "around" something, it "automatically" makes "it" suspicious. To be fair, Adam Haselhuhn is the co-founder and has written a number of posts as well.
NISGelections.com is nothing but a blatant attempt at electioneering and propaganda.
...what? Editorializing is electioneering? And who is this propaganda for?
Not only do we feel that this is a disservice to UNI student voters who are being manipulated by biased coverage, but we feel this website takes the power out of individual candidacies in campaigning to voters and places it within a shadowy behind-the-scenes entity. We feel that students should be able to make their own decisions, and should not be subjugated to the undue influence of a single individual who has stakes in the election outcome.
Then don't listen to me. Seriously, it's not that difficult. And, for what it's worth, NISGElections.com is an attempt to bring things out of the shadows.
We feel that an entity monitoring election coverage should not be advocating a specific way to vote. However, the site has also endorsed multiple candidacies and has called for specific rulings through the election commission. Nisgelections.com, we feel, has not only committed numerous NISG election rules violations, but due to the timing of its posts has also engaged in early campaigning.
NISGElections.com should really strive to be more like The New York Times, the Washington Post, the Chicago Sun-Times, and the countless other publications who endorse candidates every election cycle. Welcome to the world of media, where endorsements are commonplace.
The Election Rules Section 1 definition of formal campaigning is:
"Actions of formal campaigning include but are not limited to, making buttons and t-shirts generally available; posting flyers; holding press conferences or rallies; communicating to a group of students; creating publicly available electronic social networking groups; posting the location of or information on a campaign website; issuing/allowing the dissemination of information through e-mail, text message, postal or campus mail; etc."
We believe NISGelections.com has certainly communicated to a group of students, has posted information on candidacies on a website, and has disseminated information widely related to the elections. Posts began as early as January 18, 2011. On this date, the author, an NISG senator, introduced himself and the Presidential/Vice Presidential tickets. Information on candidates was disseminated prior to the election campaign season beginning on February 1, 2011. Therefore, according to the election rules, NISGelections.com has engaged in campaigning and early campaigning.
Election rules govern those running for office, not the press.
We feel that this site is entirely illegal. It may have been approved by the Northern Iowan, but has not been condoned by NISG. The Northern Iowan is an NISG recognized student organization, and must in turn follow the rules of NISG."Illegal" does not mean what you think it does.
We believe this entire election cycle has lost its legitimacy and we call for the Northern Iowa Student Government to take action to either 1)remove NISG recognition of the Northern Iowan or 2) censor NISGelections.com"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Not only is what you are proposing absurd, it's actually illegal. Best of luck to Kingery is his bid to censor the press.
In the meantime, NISGElections.com will continue to provide you the best coverage of this year's election. Stay tuned in these next couple of days as the elections unfold.
My favorite part of this is: ""Illegal" does not mean what you think it does."
ReplyDeleteHope you don't let this get to you, Trevor. I think you're doing a great service to the UNI student body by running this site and I have enjoyed keeping up with your posts.
Seriously Michael? The student newspaper's coverage of the student government elections is illegal? Give me a break.
ReplyDeleteI guess it's time to remove NISGElections.com from the ballot. Damn shame too. I really had planned on voting for them.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite part is probably his call to NISG to cease recognizing the Northern Iowan, as if NISG oversaw it, when really it does not answer to NISG, it does not receive funding from NISG, and NISG has no say in the operations of the Northern Iowan.
ReplyDeleteI find it sick to the see the name of the newspaper and this blog dragged through the mud by somebody so misinformed about the history of journalism and its processes (most major news outlets make presidential endorsements), and am disappointed that Mr. Kingery jumped to making a public group before actually taking his concerns to people who are in charge and who may have been willing to listen to them and address them.
I wrote an essay a few years ago about the Olive Garden and put it on my website. I get hate mail all the time. I find it funny that many people write things like:
ReplyDeleteI read your "essay" the other day and was outraged...
The whole "put quotes around something" school of argument makes me just laugh at the stupidity. Wait - I just did it. Shit. I'm going to go lie down now.
*facepalm*
ReplyDelete